Wednesday, January 25, 2006

MCAT Study Method

It's about time that I posted as much of my personal strategy that I can in this thread. To be honest I'm kind of ashamed that I haven't yet! Without further ado, here is Vihsadas's Personal MCAT Strategy (err...mostly, I think.):

1) Your individual scores and composite score:
PS: 15
BS: 14
VR: 11
WS: S
Composite MCAT: 40S

2) The study method used for each section

As a general note, practice will always be the most important part of your MCAT preparation…for any section. You should make time to do as many practice exams as you possibly can and to do practice problems as you are doing your content review. For the MCAT, you need to become comfortable with the testing format, the types of questions, and the manner in which concepts and information is tested. Being familiar with these aspects of the exam can only come through long and thorough practice of MCAT material. If you are diligent and really put forth maximal effort into practicing the material, you will start to gain an intuition about MCAT questions, and how to approach them. Accordingly, the number one mistake made by MCAT studiers is to only review the material in great depth, and to neglect actually taking timed, full-length practice MCAT exams. In fact, you must do both.

PS:
Understanding Concepts and Developing an Intuition – The best way to approach this section is to be extremely curious about the concepts presented. When you are reviewing a particular concept you should constantly be asking yourself “WHY?” Doing so will refocus your thought process from one of memorization to one of understanding. In fact, you must understand why all of the equations are the way they are, and why they make logical sense. One way to facilitate this process is to try and work through what you think should happen without worrying about the numbers at first. Often, students have memorized an equation and will just settle for plugging values into an equation in order to try and arrive at an answer. Unfortunately, this process often bogs the student down in number crunching at the expense of understanding what is actually going on. The latter is extremely important for the MCAT.
Thus, when you are doing physics and chemistry problems, the first thing you should do is think about the general result you would expect from the situation given. Only when you have understood what should happen conceptually, should you begin number crunching. For instance, if you are dealing with an acid base buffer problem and the question asks, “What will the pH be after I add X amount of Y substance?”, the first thing you should do is ask yourself, “Would I expect the pH to increase a little or a lot, stay the same, or decrease a little or a lot?” Once you think through the concepts, you’ll be more confident in your numerical answer as well as have an understanding of why your numerical answer is correct. After all, the MCAT is a thinking test. If you do not understand the concepts you simply will not be able to confidently answer a fair number of problems on the real exam. That being said, even though I have stressed the importance of concepts, you still must also know all of the relevant equations, and be comfortable with manipulating those equations. Both concept understanding and skill in formula manipulation are necessary for success on the MCAT PS.

Additional Note: When we say we are doing "Content Review" in terms of PS, this includes doing practice problems along with your content review to absorb the material. For physics and chemistry, an integral part of learning to understand the material is to work through problems to make the logical process more concrete in your mind. Thus, do sectional tests, practice problems and practice passage (but not timed, full lengths!) when studying.

Learning to be Highly Proficient with Simple Math – This is a point that is grossly overlooked both by students themselves and test prep companies. In my opinion, the most important factor that separates the average speed test taker from one who can finish the PS section with 10-20mins remaining is the ease at which the latter uses estimation methods, tricks with formula manipulation, and answer elimination techniques to reduce the amount of scratch work necessary to complete a problem. On my real exam, I used no more than ¼ a single-sided page for scratch work on the PS. Because I was intensely comfortable with order of magnitude estimation, decimal estimation, log estimation, dimensional analysis and conceptual knowledge I could eliminate answer without too much written math. Sure, you could use the formulas to explicitly solve each problem, but using estimation along with formula manipulation will save you whole minutes on the real exam. In previous posts I have highlighted one example of this:
Estimation trick for pH and log calculations

In addition, you must be completely comfortable with orders of magnitude estimation. You should be able to figure out just from estimation what the order of magnitude of the answer should be. This will aid you in eliminating one or two answers right away. One way to start to get good at this is to treat every number in scientific notation:
If X = n x 10^-4 and Y = p x 10^8, then Y/X = (p/n)x 10^(8 + 4).
You must be completely fluent in order of magnitude manipulation like this. Definitely practice it.

You should also become familiar with estimating the decimal values of weird looking fractions and the fractional values of weird looking decimals. For instance, .3145/.6021 might look difficult, but it’s approximately = ½. This kind of estimation is usually sufficient for the MCAT, and GREATLY simplifies the manipulation of formulas and numerical calculations.

Dimensional Analysis – Using the units of physical quantities to your advantage is also often grossly overlooked by students. One way to check your math is to manipulate the units of the quantities you are using while you are manipulating the math.
The following post sufficiently explains one very MCAT relevant way of how you should be able to use dimensional analysis on the PS section of the MCAT:
An example of how dimensional analysis can really save you one the MCAT.

An additional way dimensional analysis can be helpful is if you forget the formula for something. Let’s say that you forgot that one of the formulas for electric potential (Volts) is Volts = Electric field * distance. Let’s say that you know that Voltage is expressed in Joules/Coulomb and Electric field is Newtons/Coulomb. Then, you remember that Work (Joules) = Force (Newtons) * Distance (meters). Therefore, if I multiply Newtons/Coulomb * Distance I get Joules/Coulomb, which is the correct units for electric potential. Usually, this trick will lead you to the right answer!
A word of warning, however, about this last point: Sometimes there will be an extra constant factor needed to arrive at the correct answer. Therefore, only use this technique when you really forget the correct formula and be wary for extra constants! Example:
Let’s say that you know the units of energy are [E] ~ kgm^2/s^2. Knowing that, it would be reasonable to guess that one correct formula for energy would be E = mass*velocity^2. Afterall, mass*velocity^2 has the correct units…but because of how the formula for energy was derived, energy, as you know, is actually = ½ mass*velocity^2.
So while this particular trick with dimensional analysis can be useful, you must not rely on it.

VR:
See the following post: My Verbal Strategy
Just as a note, I wanted to say that I was scoring 13-15s on the verbal practice exams for AAMC CBT 7-10. As a word of warning, please heed the part I mention about being able to do the verbal section with 5-10mins remaining. If you get a monster verbal section like I did on the MCAT, you’ll at least be prepared to get through the entire thing. My real verbal was hard. Really hard. Be prepared!

BS:
Biology is like a Modified Verbal Section – The trick to the BS is treating this section a little like the verbal section. You should definitely memorize everything that you possibly can in terms of biology and organic, but, while your are memorizing you MUST think long and hard about the logic of what you are memorizing. For instance, you can memorize all of the favorable and less favorable conditions that lead to Sn2 or Sn1 or E1 or E2 reactions in organic, but, do you have a conceptual understanding of WHY these different conditions favor one type of reaction over the other. This type of conceptual understanding on the bio section is absolutely necessary for the MCAT. Then, you will have to be able to understand the logic that is presented in the passage (because it will be more convoluted than in the PS) and using the logic set down by the passage, apply what you already know.

Know Intimately what you Expect to be Tested on– One type of logic useful for the BS section is to be familiar with the topics that you would expect to be tested and to use that knowledge to your advantage. Let me give you an example. Let's say you are given a large organic macro-molecule diagram with various keto/acetyl-groups labeled "A" "B" "C" "D". You are then asked "Enzyme X is added to a solution of the macromolecule, which keto/acetyl group do you expect to be cleaved?"
Now let's say you have absolutely no idea what enzyme X does and you have never even heard of enzyme X. What would you do? On the MCAT, with the information I've given you, you should be able to guess what the operative characteristic is that the test-maker is trying to test. I can guarantee that it has something to do with how strongly that "O" is drawing electrons from that C=O bond. So without even looking at the answer choices, you should be able to narrow it down to two possibilities: the highest amount of electron draw, and the lowest amount of electron draw.

Applying knowledge to novel situations – While this is important for the PS section as well, it's much, much more likley to show up on the BS section. You will be asked to integrate many different subjects in one passage and use your conceptual knowledge to find an integrated answer. Sure you know all the oxidation and reduction reactions, but if I gave you a novel reaction could you logic out whether it should be an oxidation or reduction reaction? Then, could you use that information to determine whether that reaction would help or hurt the aerobic capcity of a mammal? Do you understand WHY the oxidation and reduction reactions proceed the way they do? Can you hypothesize mechanisms for different reactions? Do you understand WHY electrons move the way that they do? Always, always, always ask ‘why?’ Then, of course, you still do have to memorize all of the information as well.
It take all of 1) Memorization, 2) Conceptual understanding, and 3) Problem Practice!

Additional Note: Although more helpful for the PS section, doing practice problems during your content review including sectional tests and practice passages can also be helpful to drive home important concepts in the BS section. This is especially true for the organic chemistry section. I definitely recommend doing some practice problems as you finish various sections in your content review, but again, timed full length practice during your content review may not be that helpful. Save those full-lengths for after your content review study months.

3) The practice materials you used
Kaplan Premiere Program Book (2008)
Princeton Review ‘Cracking the CBT’ (2008)
The Princeton Review Verbal Workbook
Kaplan Sectionals and Topical Exams
Kaplan QBank
Monthly Quizzes and Tests from Kaplan Online (Comes with Premiere Program)
Wikipedia and Google (Seriously, for random things I wanted to know)

I studied the Kaplan Premiere Program and Princeton Review Cracking the CBT book side by side. Although there is a large amount of overlap between the two books, each book covers the material from a different angle and there is some information that is not doubled in each section. I found this tactic to be very helpful in gaining a deeper understanding of the material, particularly for the organic chemistry section of the exam.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
I made absolutely sure to get my hands on as many practice tests as I possibly could. Altogether I took 20 practice exams. I had access to:
AAMCCBT 3 – 10 and the extra passages from 3R – 9R (8 exams)
Exams that came with the Princeton review ‘Cracking the CBT’ (4 exams)
Free Princeton Review Exam (1 Exam)
Kaplan Full Lengths 1- 11 (11 Exams)
Free Kaplan Exam (1 Exam)
Gold Standard CBT Free Exam (1 Exam)
Two Kaplan Exams on CD, Premiere Program, (2 Exams)

A Copy of my testing schedule is attached to this post.

5) What was your undergraduate major
I started off as a B.Mus in Music Theory at the McGill Conservatory of Music and then started all over again in a joint program in Physics and Physiology in my 3rd year. I finished my undergraduate degree after 6 years.


6) Any other tips you may have
Post-Game Analysis: The most important thing you can do is post-game analysis of your practice exams. Keep a log of the types of questions that you are missing, and why you thought you missed the question. Make sure that you review every single problem, right or wrong on your practice exams. Even though you may have gotten a problem correct, you need to ensure that you got it right with the correct thought process and also, in the most efficient manner possible. Therefore, you need to review every single problem that you do on practice exams. If you do this you will begin to see a pattern about how the MCAT test makers have structured the exam questions, and how to develop what I call ‘MCAT intuition’ about what the correct and incorrect answers are.

What is the test maker thinking? Accordingly, think about what the test maker is trying to test! Really try and figure out what concept or thought process or piece of knowledge the test maker is trying to test with a particular question. If you think about that, you have a better chance of not over-complicating problems and seeing what you are supposed to do. It is important to try and think from their perspective.

Critically think about what you are a doing! Although it seems obvious I guarantee that many of you are not doing this! I know, because when I started studying I wasn’t doing this either. Always ask ‘why?’ and always question the process you are taking. You must always be critically thinking about how you are approaching each problem. Make sure that you are completely aware of exactly what you are doing, and why you are doing it when you are testing.

Practice! The more practice you do, the more familiar you will be with the material in an MCAT format, and the more familiar you will be with doing the calculations or thinking that will be required of you on the MCAT. This is extremely important. Practice as much as you can, and whenever you can.

Ample Content Review: Although practice is definitely more important than studying, in my opinion the best way to study (if you have the luxury of time) is to do solid content review for 1 – 1.5 months and then do a very, very arduous string of practice exams for the next 1 – 1.5 months. I believe that taking full-length, timed practice exams when you lack a cursory knowledge of the topics and material covered on the MCAT is a waste of time. You can’t improve your MCAT test-taking skills if you don’t have the basic MCAT knowledge at hand. Personally, I did 1 to 1.5 months of solid content review with a diagnostic at the beginning, and then 1.5 months of practice exams, reviewing the material between exam days. Note, however, that I did do practice problems in the course of my content review. In fact, practice problems are very important for gaining a solid understanding of some of the concepts, especially in the PS! What I am saying is to avoid doing practice tests during your content review, but practice problems, however, are very important!

In my opinion, the four most important keys to MCAT success are:

1) Practice!
2) Know everything. Really.
3) Understand the Concepts and Logic.
4) Do many, many full length timed practice exams.

In the final days before the exam: In the final 2-3 weeks before you real exam you must develop a routine to get your body and mind ready for test day. For instance, I planned my 'homestretch' for 2.5 weeks before my exam. At this point content review is long ago done with. I'm not really even opening up my books anymore unless there's a random/weird fact I somehow missed. The last 2.5 weeks are for tying up loose ends, final test-taking preparation, and getting yourself into an MCAT Rhythm. Here’s what I did:

1) I took four AAMC CBTs in these final days and I planed 3 day breaks between each of these last four exams so that my actual MCAT was synchronized with this schedule. It is important to make these last exams AAMC exams because they are the closest thing you have to the real MCAT.
2) In addition, I took each of these last four exam at the exact time that I would take my real MCAT, and woke up and went to sleep at the same time that I would on and before real test day.
3) I also restrained myself from going to my refrigerator during breaks, and brought an ‘MCAT lunch and snack’ which was exactly what I would take to the real MCAT to my room on practice test days.
4) In the days between exams, I reviewed the tests (the same way as I suggest above) and also did peripheral content review if there was a particular concept or question I was still shaky on.

By simulating real test taking conditions as close as possible and developing a ‘routine’, when I got to my real exam, it was just another day at the office so to speak. My body, my sleep cycle, and my mind were just continuing the routine I had developed over those last 2.5 weeks.

I took the first of the final four tests on a Wednesday, the next on the following Sunday (3 day break), the next on the following Thursday (3 day break), and the final one on the following Monday (3 day break). That way I had a 3 day break until my real exam which was Friday.

I believe that making my last four exam times periodic and treating them like my real exam really helped. When I sat down to do my real exam it really felt like it was nothing unusual from my normal routine. I was prepared, and I had done this before... That helped to calm my nerves and give me extra confidence.

7) How long did you study?
Total time studied: I studied for approximately 3 to 3.5 months for 4-8 hours every day, 7 days a week.

Guys, you really can do this. Just treat the MCAT like a big game, a competition of sorts that you are trying to win at. Get excited about studying and doing better on the next practice exam. If you are able to take that pseudo-masochistic viewpoint, the MCAT almost becomes fun. Put your mind, body, soul…put your entire existence into this MCAT for a few months. Remember, it’ll be worth it in the end. If I can do it, you can to. You just have to figure out the best way for you to gain your own success. Good luck, and kick that MCAT straight in the crotch!

bozz - what do you mean by dimensional analysis?
As Bozz said, this is using the units of the variables/quantities you are given to arrive at the answer. On the MCAT this can be a very poweful technique for a number of the chemistry and physics problems. Here's an example:

Often you'll get a passage that gives you some new formulas that apply to a specific situation. Let's say...an electron passing through a curved plate capacitor: You might be given some novel equations that deal with the velocity, energy, etc. of the electron. Then you'll get a question which says something like:

"Which of the following expressions describes the force that is applied to the electron?"

The answer choices will all be expressions containing variables and quantities that are in the passage. Now, there are two ways to attempt these types of problems:

1) Figure out how the formulas that were given in the passage (usually complicated) and the formulas that you know from your studying fit together and eventually simplify down to one of the answer choices. This usually requires some tedious algebra, and also understanding of the equations themselves. This is the slow way.

2) What is funny about the MCAT is that questions like the one above, will often be structured so that every single answer choice will have different units! Since the question asks for an expression of force, one of the answer choices must have the units of force (kg*m/s^2). If you realize this, you can easily exploit dimensional analysis to arrive at the correct answer.

You just take 20 seconds to check the units of each answer choice, and then answer that has the units of force must be the right answer. Et Voila! Done in under 30 seconds...

On the MCAT board, when I harp about learning to do problems "in the most efficient, quickest way possible, using the least amount of paperwork and math", this is the kind of thing I'm talking about.

My verbal strategy...(I bombed on the real thing comparatively to my practices. I avged 12-15 on practices, scored a 12 on my diagnostic, but an 11 on the real thing. That being said, I'm still ecstatic!)

1) Practice under harsher timed conditions than you will encounter on the test. You will have about 8.5 mins for every verbal passage. Get a stop watch and a verbal workbook, and practice finishing every passage in 6.5 mins. When I started doing this, two things happened: 1)Even though I was using less time, my scores did not decrease. They stayed the same. 2) When I became really good at answering the passages quickly, I found that I had time to refer back to the passage on every question. Now, since I can read the passages much more effectively (meaning faster) when I see a question that I'm not sure of, I have time to go back and quickly re-read the 3-4 sentences that pertain to the question. At this point, my scores started to increase.

2) Attack every single paragraph. Read very quickly, but read very actively. Don't try and go too slowly to remember every detail, this will kill you. What you should do is Gather the main idea of every paragraph, and make sure you're always thinking about the POINT of the passage. Eventually, when you've done enough verbal practice, gathering the idea of a section or paragraph will come very naturally. As a byproduct, you will start to gain a sense of the types of details that are important to remember, and you will begin to remember them automatically.

3) When doing the read-through, DO NOT re-read a sentence if you think you weren't paying attention. Try this on any reading material: Try reading very actively, but force yourself not to re-read sentences you just read or to go back on the first read through. If you are actively reading, its amazing how much you retain without having to re-read. Your brain often tricks you into thinking that you didn't understand something, when in fact you did.

4) You should be categorizing the paragraphs in your head. Remember that the reading material on the verbal section is always written so that the information is organized in some logical way. The AAMC specifically picks passages that are not haphazardly organized and written. "Categorizing" means that you should be thinking about the general subject of each paragraph so that you know where in the passage to look for information when you need to refer back as you answer the questions. It does not mean stopping and summarizing every paragraph in your head as you read. This way you don't waste time re-reading large sections of the passage (or the whole passage!) to find helpful information when you do need to refer back. Instead, your categorical map of the paragraphs will give you a general idea of where that information should be located. This will save you important time when you reach one of those questions that you don't know right off the bat. Lastly, the categorical map you create as you are doing your first read through should be in your head. This means you are really just making mental notes that point you in the right direction, and not summarizing.

5) Answer every question in order, do not skip questions. I think that this particular point works really well because often the questions themselves are ALOT of reading! If you read a question, decide that its too hard and skip to the next, you'll then have to come back and re-read the question on your second attempt thereby wasting time! Make a mental note of and use the CBT's "mark" function on the questions that are iffy so that when you do go back and review all of your answer, you know which questions you should focus more time on.

6) Be aware of the different question types on the verbal section. The princeton review book has a list of these, and I think the Kaplan one does as well. In addition, when you are reviewing your practice exams you should make your own list of what you think the different question types are. As to HOW to answer every question type; This is one of the major areas where practice comes into it. As you get better, you'll begin to realize the types of things that look like 'correct' answers, and you get a feel for the types of things that the examiner is looking for. Check out the "process of elimination" section (number 8 in this post).

7) Do heavy post-game analysis. You must, must, must go back over your verbal questions and ensure that your thought process was correct for the questions that you got right. Figuring out what exactly you were thinking when you answered a question incorrectly is absolutely essential. That way, when you find yourself thinking in a similar way on a future exam, you might stop and think twice about your answer. Do not ever say, "Oh I totally should have gotten that question! It's easy!" If you missed a question, you missed it for a reason. Instead of passing it off as a "stupid mistake" make sure you understand exactly why you made that mistake, and what you were thinking when you made it. Then, you should try and figure which types of questions you are most often missing and analyze your thought process to see what wrong thought caused you to pick a wrong answer. Then, be aware, and fix that thought process.

8) Learn to use process of elimination (POE). There are a few tricks you can use to POE the hell out of some verbal questions.
- Extreme sounding answers are almost always wrong. Exception: If the passage itself sounds extreme. You should still make sure that your answer choice fits with the logic of the question and the passage itself. For instance, the question could ask, "Which of the following is NOT representative of the author's stance of issue X". In these types of questions, the extreme answer might be right.

- In questions that ask you to describe the 'mood' of the author, or any question with 'one word' answer choices, answers that are similar or say the same thing are almost always both wrong. Check and see if you picked an answer that sounds very similar to another one, and make sure you know exactly why you chose that answer. The MCAT will never be cut and dry, so just make sure your logic about an answer choice is clear.
- Watch out answer choices with identical or similar vocabulary to the passage. A very common trick is that often words that were used in the passage will be transplanted into an answer choice with either: 1) a cause and effect relationship reversed so that it is wrong, 2) a fact from the passage taken out of context, 3) a hypothesis that is mis-stated, 4) a slight twisting of the author's logic, 5) an incorrect detail has been inserted into the answer choice. Watch out for these, and when you see an answer choice with alot of identical words to the passage, be very sure to dissect it so that you understand its meaning. As you practice more and more, you'll begin to find other curious aspects of answer choices and question stems that stick out at you.

9) PRACTICE!!!
No seriously, practice. Developing an MCAT intuition is like developing a muscle. You can't cram for it, and you can't practice it "sometimes" while expecting major gains. You have to practice, consistently, repeatedly, and often.

10) Closing Note
This is my entire strategy. What worked for me may not work for you, but it's worth a shot! If something different than what I've posted here works for you, then use it! (and more importantly, come back to The Studentdoctor Network and tell us about it!)
I picked up a princeton review verbal workbook (I think you can only get them from the class) and I did two passages every 1-2 days starting at about 3 months before my MCAT. Toward the end of my practice test runs I was consistently getting 13s and 14s in verbal on the AAMCs. This section is doable guys. Just make sure you are practicing properly and meticulously reviewing your answers! Just doing passages isn't going to give you exponential gains in performance. You have to practice and review the right way.
Good luck guys. If I can do it, you guys seriously can too...

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=6695902&postcount=273

MCAT studying tips

Hello everyone, I've been reading these forums for a while, and I decided to contribute something since I got my scores a few days ago. I'd like to explain my study "techniques" that got me a high score with a relatively short amount of studying (~ 1 month).

Some background: 4th year biochemistry student at a fairly prestigious university, no mcat prep courses, and this was my first time taking the test. I finished all of my courses at the end of the fall, so I could concentrate "full time" on studying for the January 25/26 exam date.

My study setup: sitting at my desk with my computer, listening to music, taking semi-frequent breaks (just don't overdo it).

First step, I picked up the entire ExamKrackers MCAT Prep series, with the chem, orgo, bio, and VR sections, as well as one written practice test. I actually picked this up last spring, but kept on putting off studying until it came down to it. During winter break, about a month before the exam, I started studying several hours a day. I found that the EK series provided almost everything I needed for the exam. If I had trouble understanding something, I usually checked wikipedia. One time I referred to a Physics SATII review book, so don't forget old sources and textbooks you may still have.

If you haven't looked at the EK series, each book is divided into several "lectures". My study habit consisted of reading each lecture in order, while taking detailed, yet highly condensed notes on my computer for each section. If you read the chapters carefully and try to absorb the material before moving on, it should be easy to do this. When I say condensed, I mean each lecture was reduced to about 1/3 of a printed page, 11 point font, with bullet points. For example, one bullet point says:

* peptide hormones: preprohormones cleaved in rough ER lumen to prohormones -> modified in golgi w/ cleavage and/or glycosylation -> exported via vesicle -> acts on effector (target cell) via receptor -> intracellular second messenger

If you condense the entirety of the exam material to 15 pages, it's no longer too much to handle and you can study *everything* multiple times per day!!

If you're able to write these notes as you study each section for the first time, and do not move on until you're able to answer all of the sample questions interspersed throughout each lecture, you should end up with a solid understanding of each concept. I averaged 1.5-2 lectures a day, leaving the 30-minute exams in the back of each book for later.

Once I'd finished with a book, I'd move on to another subject, then after completing those lectures, I'd return to a previously finished subject, review my condensed notes (remember, 3-5 pages for each entire subject), then take all of the 30 minute exams, stopping after each one to grade it, figure out my mistakes, reread the relevant content, and possibly update my notes if needed. I feel that mixing up the reading and the 30-minute exams gives both the necessary practice, as well as allowing you to review the material more effectively, so you can remember it. FYI, I was scoring fairly poorly on these (often around 8-9): I think they were rather difficult, but they were great practice if you went back to review to figure out your mistakes AND UNDERSTAND THEM!

Once I had gone through all the sciences, I started on the VR book for last, which then gave me all sorts of general tips at the beginning that I should have known as I was doing the rest of the series . Make sure you do this entire book, as I felt is was very helpful and took very little time.

As for the writing sample, I read the EK advice, read a few sample essays from AAMC, then condensed it down to this exactly:

1. explain statement and its context, why it applies to the human condition (1 paragraph). first sentence should present main idea, but allow for possibility that it may not always apply.
2. provide an example and clarify it (1 p) and maybe another example if you have time
3. provide a counterexample, develop/explain, and explain why it contradicts
4. provide guidelines for determining when it applies and when it doesn't, in context of the given examples

I believe that if you use flowery language, and more "touchy-feely" examples that would make liberal arts professor proud, that the graders will be more impressed with the writing. During the exam, I followed these steps exactly to create a quick paragraph-by-paragraph outline to make sure I didn't skip anything, then filled it in, finishing about 2-3 minutes before the 30-minute mark for each essay.

I should say that at this point, I had a pretty major obstacle come up with my studying plans: a bad case of the flu, starting about 5 days before the exam date. Considering how much I was cramming, this screwed things up considerably, as I could barely sleep, let alone function while trying to study. Still, I kept on trying, with generous doses of ibuprofen to keep the pain down, and large amounts of caffeine to keep me awake.

Moving on, once I had taken all my notes, done all the 30-minute exams, I still had not done any full length practice exams! Still, I went over my notes, printed out, while skimming the book alongside them. This helped make sure I could recall any diagrams, as well as again reinforcing everything in my mind. Once I felt fairly comfortable with this, it was actually the day before the exam. I signed up for the free electronic practice exam from AAMC and took that, scoring in the low 30's , but also occasionally using the "cheat" feature that would explain the answers. My entire purpose at this point was to drill as much of the material into my head as possible, and immediately after the practice test, I again went over my notes repeatedly. Since the entire set was 15 pages, I could do this multiple times very quickly.

That evening, I was still very sick and only managed to sleep for 4 hours. In the morning, I felt even worse, but still went on to take the test. I again took my notes with me to the exam room, and studied them over and over again, until I was called in to take the exam (see a pattern here?).

As for the exam, I somehow completely skipped 2 questions in PS that I didn't notice until there was <5 seconds left, so I couldn't even guess on them. I thought that was the hardest section. I followed my set of steps for the essay, did my VR with no idea of what score I'd get, but actually felt pretty good with the BS section. I felt that I may have done well enough to not void my score, so I went ahead and had it graded. I was honestly expecting something in the 20's, and spent my time up until the score release trying to decide when I was gonna retake the test.

When my scores were released (1 day late after 30 days... thanks AAMC), I checked them online and found a 38S! 15/12/11 (BS/VR/PS). Apparently my study habits worked well enough for a perfect score on biological sciences, and as good as I could ever expect on the VR. My PS score was obviously hit by the few questions that I skipped completely but still was respectable.

So, my main advice is to create a set of detailed, highly condensed notes, and *repeatedly* review them. This way, you won't get tripped up by obscure details or equations, since you'll have them all memorized. And if you did all the sample questions, you should be somewhat familiar with the testing style.

If you condense the entirety of the exam material to 15 pages, it's no longer too much to handle and you can study *everything* multiple times per day!!

What I'd do different: first, get a flu shot. second, I feel if I had even a few more weeks to study and do more practice exams, I could have scored even better, had I not been sick. Ideally, I would have set my own schedule across 3-4 months, but I still would have the same study process, just much more of it.

In addition: this study method is definitely not for everyone! If you require lots of structure (like a 2-3 month course), this obviously won't work. Also, I had learned almost all of the material before, but the courses were so long ago (such as AP chemistry from 10th grade) that I effectively was relearning everything as I went. I had taken more advanced material in the meantime, so that may have helped with a subconscious understanding of the fundamentals.

One last thing: I'd post my set of notes, but it's written in such shorthand that it would likely be detrimental for someone else to use it. Write your own set of notes, and the process itself will help you absorb the material.

Thanks to everyone that's posted on this board! It's been helpful reading from people in the same boat as me. To everyone who is still going to take the MCAT, good luck!
Last edited by gecko45; 02-27-2008 at 02:59 PM.

ARITHMETIC tricks

ARITHMETIC tricks you could implement int he MCAT

Key things that I have found hurt people are:

Powers of ten: This is helped by decimal hopping and labeling numbers with "increased by factor of 10" or "decreased by factor of 100". It comes down to paying attention really.

Ratios: These are made easiest by making denominators easy to deal with. Also, if a ratio is hard to calculate as written, flip it and see if it is easier the other way. We somehow emotionally deal with bigger-over-smaller ratios better than smaller-over-bigger ratios.

Fractions and Equivalent Decimal-based Value: Learn the correlation between fractions and decimals 1/4 = .25, 1/5 = .2, etc... These can prove EXTREMELY useful on the exam.

There are many more strategies and techniques, but these are generally the big three for most people. A little practice goes a long, long way.

The funny thing I've found is that the supposedly more difficult math skills like logs, square roots of complex numbers, and exponential decay/growth are typically easier for people than basic division, fractions, and multiplication.

One of my favorite tricks is Left Add Right Subtract. This refers to exponents, for example, if you move the decimal point to the left one, you need to add one to the exponent. If you move the decimal point to the right one, you need to subtract one from the exponent.

1 x 10^5, move left one decimal point to the left and you got .1 x 10^6

I hope this helps.

Here's an invaluable one that we use to help our students. Its a process more than a trick, but the end result is the trig function value of every important angle on the MCAT. Is seems long when written out, but its completely brainless and takes about 15 seconds to write down (tutorial anyone?)

1. create a table with 3 columns, one for angle, one for sin, one for cos.
2. write in the most important angles on the mcat in the left column: 0, 30, 45, 60, 90
3. in each cell in the sin and cos columns, put in "/2". Essentially every value has a 2 in the denominator.
4. now put a square root sign with nothing inside of it in the numerator of each cell fraction.
5. now start counting from the top. in the sin of 0, put a 0 inside the sqrt, in the sin of 30, put a 1 inside the sqrt, 45 gets 2, 60 gets 3, 90 gets 4. If you did it right, the sin of 0 should show up as sqrt 0 / 2, which is 0. sin 90 should show up as sqrt 4 / 2, which is 1.
6. do the same, but in reverse, for the cos column, cos 90 is (sqrt 0)/2, etc.

Like I said, it looks much worse written out than if you just create the table. Using this you'll have an elegant way to pull up the sin and cos of any important angle on the mcat.
I love that table! It works wonderfully...and you'll have it memorized if you use it enough.

Another good one is just simply becoming comfortable with scientific notation.

This one is more just practice than anything. The basic rule is that you can add exponents of scientific notation and multiply the number in front, and, you can change the sign of exponents on the bottom and move them to the top.

Here is one. It might be a little much for the mcat, but it is cool nonetheless. It's the Babylonian Method (old school).

To calculate the square root of a number:

First guess roughly what you think it would be (number less than 1 guess bigger, for a number greater than 1 guess smaller)

Then divide your guess into the square root number.

Now take your answer and add it to your guess and divide by 2. Presto, you should be very close to the real number.

so for example:

sqrt of .78 = Guess .85

.78
-----= ~.9
.85

.85+.9
-------= ~.87 And this should be your answer (or close enough)
2

The real answer using a calculator is: 0.866 or rounded .87!!

Also, Berkeley Review has a great method for decimal and fraction conversions. This is straight from their stoichiometry chapter.

If you memorize common fractions and decimals, you can mutiply and divide fractions by quickly converting an easy denominator. I've memorized the decimal values of the all fractions from ½ to 1/12 and just wrote them down in a little table. I'd list them here, but it's a little too much time. lol it's the one time you can prob use a calculator for the next however many months!


Ex) 18/66=?
18/66=3/11----->>> 1/11 = 0.091; 3/11=
3 x (1/11)=
3 x (.091)=.273


Ex2) to estimate 11/12,
*1/12=.083


11/12--->(12-1)/12--->12/12 - 1/12----->1- (1/12)--->1-(0.083)=.917

Although not really MCAT related, my favorite math trick is when you multiply two number, multi-digit in the from XA and X(10-A) (i.e 23x27, 35x35, 41x49), or in other words the ones digits add up to 10 and the rest of the digits are the same. So first multiply the ones digits normally and write that down. Then, add one to the rest of the digits and multiple those4 together and place them in front of the two digits you wrote down eariler.

and by the way if the ones digits are 1 and 9 you wriet down 09.

For exapmple 23x27

One digits - 3x7 = 21
add on to rest and multiply 3x2 = 6
place both halves together and 23x27= 621
and it works for every single case.

Oh and when multiplying two numbers (that are relativly reasonable) together without brute forcing it is to multplie two numbers taht are close to it and then add on the diffference. Say 52x18, you could do 50x18 (which can bee done in your head) then add 36, or 20x52 (which is also preety simple) minus 104. not too bad really.

You can use 0kazak1's method...but the fastest way to do 48*52 would be to to rewrite it as:

48*52 = (50-2)(50+2) = 50^2 - 2^2 = 2496.

If two numbers are close together, both even or both odd (so that their average is an integer), you can use this method if you know the square of the average.

Bu t if you do the second way you could do 50x48=2400 + 96 (48x2)
or 50x52= 2600 - 104 which would give you the same thing. or up above works too, but if you get good at

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Robots Replacing Doctors in Operating Rooms

Many science fiction writers have dreamed of it. But not even Phillip K. Dick would have imagined the day should come so soon ― robots are replacing doctors in operating rooms.

The world is seeing a craze for robotic surgery, where machines take care of precise sewing, clipping or other procedures. Patients undergoing operations and doctors performing them claim they are safer and less painful, and more and more people are expressing their willingness to go under the knives of these machines.

Amid the craze, there is the Da Vinci surgical system, which is said to be the best in the business.

Da Vinci Robot: Epitome of Medical Robots

Robotic surgery involves making three to five 0.5-1 centimeter incisions near the affected are instead of cutting and opening it up, and then using robot arms inserted into them to perform the surgery.

The idea for the system came first from the military. The United States government thought robots could conduct basic combat surgery in the field remotely operated by doctors.

The basic idea was for robots to repair wounds and injuries using micro-tools controlled by doctors in urban medical centers ― certainly one of the most fascinating ideas at the time.

The prototype was developed in 1992 and was first introduced to the public in 1997 in Belgium after winning U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval.

The machine consisted of two-lens endoscopes with attached articulated instruments having a full-range of three-dimensional movement. The operator, sitting at a consol, puts his or her arms through two armholes and manipulates the instruments as if they were actually performing the surgery.

The endoscopes send three-dimensional images to the operator and the power and directions of the robot hands can be controlled by several pedals. Doctors testified that once they get used to the images, and the feel and sense of the instruments, the process is easy to use and convenient.

In 2000, the Da Vinci system was used in about 10 cases in the U.S., but this jumped to more than 40,000 cases in 2007.

In Korea, Yonsei University's Severance Hospital first adopted Da Vinci in 2005 and has conducted successful operations on gall bladders and prostate glands. Since then, the hospital alone has conducted more than 500 surgical procedures using the robot. Now, there are 13 robots in the country and more institutions are planning to buy them.

Da Vinci Lessens Pain, Increases Comfort

Surgeons and their patients admire the machine as it brings about a win-win effect for both groups.

Prof. Lee Young-goo of Hallym University Medical Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital said Da Vinci is the best operating tool to date. Lee, also the chief of the Da Vinvi Robot Surgical Center at the hospital, said because the surgery requires smaller incisions in the abdomen, patients do not bleed so much leading to faster recovery times.

``If we have to perform open surgery, patients lose about 900 ccs of blood, but with the Da Vinci incisions they lose only about 150 ccs,'' he said. Therefore, the body receives less shock and the period for hospitalization is shortened, he added.

``It lessens patients' pain, which also leads to a shorter hospitalization period. It also has less possibility of contamination or infection, and leaves much smaller scarring,'' he said.

Kim Young-joo, who had a cancerous prostate removed in January, said he was very satisfied with the result. He said the shock of his disease and all the talking added stress to his heart beforehand.

``But I was really happy to get the surgery,'' he said. He showed his wound where only a small scar remained.

``I was able to move the day after the operation, which I never imagined. I even joked that it was a relief I was diagnosed with the disease late enough meet the robot,'' he said.

For the doctors, the robot is convenient, too. The arms move in a micro-scale and doctors say they are more articulate than human hands. Also, while human hands can shake in the middle of a procedure, the machine compensates giving a consistent performance.

``And because it is very small, the tip of its hands can move a lot and reach to a very small space in the body rapidly,'' Lee said.

Lee, an authority in urology, said the robot is especially good for prostate cancer. ``One of the side effects of the prostate cancer surgery is that incontinence often happens because surgical scalpels can cut veins. But with the robot surgery, it doesn't happen. Also, the chances of being accidentally made impotent are dramatically reduced,'' he said.

Da Vinci Taken up by Major Hospitals

Since its successful launch in Korea, the robot has been rapidly adopted by many hospitals in Korea. The Severance Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Youngdong Severance Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Asan Medical Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Bundang Seoul National University Medical Center, Donga University Hospital and Kyongbuk University Medical Center have all bought machines.

The Severance Center opened an educational institute for the robot for Asian countries while the Sacred Heart Hospital opened its own robot center.
``Because Korean surgeons have sensitive hands, teaching techniques are getting better and better,'' Na Gun-ho, a surgeon at the hospital, said.

Bundang SNU Hospital has recently started main arterial surgery with its robot. Surgeon Lee Tae-seung said the procedures were difficult, but with the Da Vinci system exceptionally precise surgery was possible.

Da Vinci Has Ups and Down

While Da Vinci surgery is successful, the high price is something that holds patients back. The Severance Hospital spokesman Lee Sung-man said the surgery costs between 7 million-20 million won.

The high costs is due to the eye-popping price of the robot itself ― 2.8 billion ― and the fact that its arms must be changed after every tenth procedure.
``It is why some people back out at the last moment,'' he said.

However, Lee Young-goo said the good outcome outweighs the cost and the pain a patient has to endure.

``I say it's the best surgical method yet,'' he said.

According to hospitals, the price is cheaper than in the U.S. and other countries ― ``I say about 20-30 percent,'' Lee said. He added that many foreigners have actually come to Korea for surgical procedures.

``For Koreans, there is no need to go abroad as surgeons here are catching up with the skill and are ready to perform,'' he said.

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/05/242_21380.html

The Future of Doctors

Dr. Manish Shah is trying to figure out why Thelma Shoe's nose keeps bleeding. At least once or twice a week, the 73-year-old has been getting nosebleeds that last up to an hour. Shoe's no stranger to the clinic; she has emphysema, cirrhosis of the liver (from medication she took for tuberculosis), and has already had heart-bypass surgery.

Shoe was Shah's first patient at Duke's outpatient clinics three years ago, when he was a first-year resident, and the two have established a comfortable rapport. "Oww, that hurts!" she says, wincing as he inserts an otoscope into each nostril. "That hurts? I'm not even touching you," he counters as he peers into her nose. Shah suspects that the bleeds are triggered by her dry nasal cavities and recommends an over-the-counter nasal saline spray, available at any drugstore. He spends a few more minutes chatting with Shoe, then reminds her to return in a few weeks for a flu shot.

This is Shah's classroom, and patients like Shoe are his textbooks. Now in his last year of residency in internal medicine, he spends two afternoons each week at the clinic, seeing patients under the supervision of an attending physician who must approve every medical decision he makes. Only the short length of his white coat betrays his status as a doctor-in-training--an M.D. after four years of medical school, he examines patients, writes prescriptions, orders tests and fills out insurance forms.

Even at a hospital like Duke, where the emphasis is on specialty and cutting-edge medicine, almost half the 130 residents in the department of medicine are training to become primary-care physicians. This is the future of health care--a back-to-basics return to the profession's roots, when small-town doctors made house calls and were expected to deal with everything from births to a burst appendix. "Our mission is to train residents in the reality of where medicine is practiced, and that's in the outpatient setting," says Dr. Barton Haynes, chairman of the department at Duke.

Shah is one of five residents participating in an innovative program that allows him to act as a primary-care physician in an HMO. All five doctors share a PCP number and take responsibility for 10 patients each week. "When I went to medical school, I don't recall learning anything about managed care," says Shah. "But working here has helped me to think about prevention more. Now I ask my patients about health-maintenance things like diet, nutrition and exercise."

The forces that have changed Shah's career path are changing Duke as well. In the department of surgery, the faculty once relied exclusively on hospital patients as case studies for teaching residents, but the average number of days that patients spend at Duke has dropped from 8.3 to 6.9 in the past five years. That prompted administrators to scrap plans for a nine-story inpatient addition to the 1,124-bed hospital and opt instead to construct the ambulatory surgery center, completed last June, which houses seven operating rooms for same-day surgery procedures. "We spent hours deciding [on the] best way to involve the residents there, because that's the way medicine is going--up to 70% of surgery is going to be done on an ambulatory basis," says Dr. Robert Anderson, the surgery department's chairman.

A Doctor’s Vision of the Future of Medicine

It's June 2018. Sally picks up a handheld device and holds it to her finger. With a tiny pinprick, it draws off a fraction of a droplet of blood, makes 2,000 different measurements and sends the data wirelessly to a distant computer for analysis. A few minutes later, Sally gets the results via e-mail, and a copy goes to her physician. All of Sally's organs are fine, and her physician advises her to do another home medical checkup in six months.

This is what the not-so-distant future of medicine will look like. Over the next two decades, medicine will change from its current reactive mode, in which doctors wait for people to get sick, to a mode that is far more preventive and rational. I like to call it P4 medicine—predictive, personalized, preventive and participatory. What's driving this change are powerful new measurement technologies and the so-called systems approach to medicine. Whereas medical researchers in the past studied disease by analyzing the effects of one gene at a time, the systems approach will give them the ability to analyze all your genes at once. The average doctor's office visit today might involve blood work and a few measurements, such as blood pressure and temperature; in the near future physicians will collect billions of bytes of information about each individual—genes, blood proteins, cells and historical data. They will use this data to assess whether your cell's biological information-handling circuits have become perturbed by disease, whether from defective genes, exposure to bad things in the environment or both.

Several emerging technologies are making this holistic, molecular approach to disease possible. Nano-size devices will measure thousands of blood elements, and DNA sequencers will decode individual human genomes rapidly, accurately and inexpensively. New computers will sort through huge amounts of data gathered annually on each individual and boil down this information to clear results about health and disease.

Medicine will begin to get more predictive and personalized (the first two aspects of P4 medicine) over the next five to 10 years. First, doctors will be able to sequence the genome of each patient, which together with other data will yield useful predictions about his or her future health; it will be able to tell you, for example, that you have a 30 percent chance of developing ovarian cancer before age 30. Second, a biannual assessment of your blood will make it possible to get an update on the current state of your health for each of your 50 or so organ systems. These steps will place the focus of medicine on individual patients and on assessing the impact that genes and their interactions with the environment have in determining health or disease.

In preventive medicine (the third P), researchers will use systems medicine to develop drugs that help prevent disease. If, say, you have a 50 percent chance of developing prostate cancer by the time you're 50, you may be able to start taking a drug when you're 30 that would reduce substantially reduce that probability. In the next 10 to 20 years the focus of health care will shift from dealing with disease to maintaining wellness.

Participatory medicine acknowledges the unparalleled opportunities that patients will have to take control of their health care. To participate effectively, though, they will have to be educated as to the basic principles of P4 medicine. New companies that can analyze human genome variation, like 23andMe and Navigenics, are already planning to provide patients with genetic information that may be useful in modifying their behavior to avoid future health problems. In the future, patients will need not just genetic data but insight into how the environment is turning genes on and off to cause disease—just as smoking often causes lung cancer and exposure to sunlight can cause skin cancer.

P4 medicine will have a big impact on many industries, including pharmaceuticals, food and insurance, as well as health care. The interesting question is whether preexisting businesses and entrenched bureaucracies will be able to respond to these winds of change, or whether a host of new companies will emerge to replace them—focused precisely on these new opportunities.

Research will also have to change. Because most important diseases such as diabetes, cancer, heart disease, obesity and Alzheimer's are so complex, the traditional approaches to studying them have had only marginal results. Powerful new systems approaches, individual measurements and computational technologies will transform our ability to deal with complexity and fashion new drugs and approaches for therapy and prevention.

Medical education will also need to be transformed. Although today's medical students will be practicing P4 medicine within the next five to 20 years, their training is still focused on a classification of disease based on observation of relatively few measurements of health parameters. Tomorrow's physicians will need to be familiar with the complexity of the human biological system as never before, and they'll have to be handy with computer-based tools. Physicians will need to deal with patients who have an enormous amount of information at their disposal. And doctors will need to deal with maintaining wellness more than with disease.

The digitization of medicine—that is, our ability to extract and store disease-relevant information from DNA and molecules in the blood of each individual—together with the revolutionary changes in diagnosis, therapy and prevention will allow those of us in the developed world to export P4 medicine to the developing world and thus transform the quality of its health care. The new P4 medicine will eventually lead to a universal democratization of health care, bringing to billions the fundamental right of health, unimaginable even a few years ago.

Hood invented the genome sequencing technology that led to the decoding of the human genome in 2001. He is a pioneer of systems biology and medicine and founder of the Institute for System Biology in Seattle, Washington.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/204227/page/2

http://library.thinkquest.org/28281/index2.htm

http://www.popsci.com/node/3441

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070724145124.htm

Sunday, January 22, 2006

MD Articles

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/Downloads/AMGA_08_data.pdf
http://ifap.ed.gov/sfahandbooks/attachments/0102Vol8Ch3loanperiodamts.pdf
http://www.science.fau.edu/student_services/prepro/ppGuideRev_2007.pdf
http://www.physiciandepot.com/Physician-Salaries.aspx
http://mdsalaries.blogspot.com/2007/02/allergist-immunologist-physician.html


By Thomas A. Breslin
and Carlos Martini
Posted July 19 2004

Email story
Print story

After nine years of carefully studying South Florida's health care climate, we at Florida International University concluded that our area cannot rely on its existing medical schools to meet the region's need for doctors.

The 100-plus page proposal for a medical school we presented to the Florida Board of Governors earlier this month outlines the economic feasibility of this project and paints the impending shortage of doctors in hard numbers. We found that:

The American Medical Association has abandoned its policy that the nation has a doctor surplus. It continues to be concerned with shortages of Hispanic and African-American physicians.

Florida depends on other states and countries for 80 percent of its doctors. It is also the state with the greatest dependence on the uncertain supply of foreign-trained physicians. Thirty-six percent of its physicians, compared to 24 percent nationally, are foreign-trained. In South Florida, over 40 percent of the physicians are foreign-trained.

Florida has the oldest physician workforce in the nation, with one-quarter of doctors age 65 or older. In South Florida, approximately 52 percent of physicians are 50 years of age or older.

Within the next 15 years, the state will receive 5 million more residents.

With the state's public medical schools located in the central and northern Florida, not quite 4 percent of South Florida's 14,000 physicians come from those schools.

University of Miami and Nova Southeastern University, both private institutions, provide medical education in South Florida. For those services, in fiscal year 2005, the state is paying nearly $15 million to the University of Miami and $5 million to NSU.

This public-private partnership concept is sound, but more is needed. UM provides just 10 percent of the region's physicians; NSU, 3 percent. Furthermore, while UM has announced it will add 32 first-year medical school seats at a satellite facility in Boca Raton, it also announced a commitment of 35-first year seats to out-of-state students. What's more, Floridians will pay UM $28,670 in tuition costs, about twice the tuition at University of Florida or University of South Florida.

So, the state's efforts are producing only 17 percent of our area's doctors, and too few of those are minorities.

Further expansion of existing medical schools is just part of the solution. Of the established medical schools, only NSU can expand without renovation or new construction. Expanding the public medical schools would cost an estimated $75 million, with little benefit to South Florida.

These figures underscore South Florida's need for a public medical school to serve its very diverse and growing population. FIU has a large student body that reflects this population. FIU graduates more Hispanics than any university in the country and is 20th in the number of blacks graduating with science, engineering and mathematics degrees.

Will an FIU medical school be cost effective? The thorough proposal we sent the Board of Governors shows we can.

Four prestigious area hospitals have said they would cooperate with FIU, eliminating the need to build a teaching hospital from scratch. Costs to the state will be generally in line with costs at UF and USF; so will tuition. A projected FIU annual tuition of $14,700 would open the field to many talented Floridians.

Because new MDs must complete a residency program before practicing and they tend to settle near their place of residency training, there is legitimate need to add more residency positions in Florida; residency programs here have reached capacity. Hospitals and clinics that want residency programs need expensive faculty and educational resources that are best provided by a new medical school nearby. Several hospitals and clinics are already strongly committed to residency programs affiliated with FIU. These programs would immediately boost local physician supply and improve health care.



Our proposal embodies years of homework on this issue. We look forward to working with our colleagues at UM and NSU to give our region the medical care it deserves and needs.



Thomas A. Breslin is the vice provost for academic affairs and Carlos Martini is director of the Medical School Project for Florida International University.
__________________
Moderator - State Licensing Forum

Still skeptical after all these years.
This is it. There are no hidden meanings.WYSIWYG

comes to wonder why they even put a med school in FSU instead of orlando and ft laudy. they cant even train the doctors fully in that rural setting. half the lawmakers went alumnus of FSU and they still wanted to compete with UF. now they are hesitant to approve more schools because of lack of financing. it is actually current schools that lobby against expansion which i feel is ridiculous. its all stupid politics. if it just was money..... i know of many private schools that would set up shop. it is the beurocratic bundle. look at NY with a comparable population to florida. they have 13 medi schools to floridas putrid 4 which was 3 not long ago.
__________________
Dr. Scott
Internal Medicine
PGY-2


How to Go to Medical School for Free
By Kim Clark
Posted June 2, 2008

Corrected on 6/04/2008: A previous version of this article said that the military scholarship programs require two years of service for each year of scholarship received.

A growing number of government agencies, universities, and charities are trying to ease the burden of medical school by offering free or nearly free rides.

That's worth a lot. Even if you go to your home state's medical school, the sticker price on a medical degree will very likely top out at $140,000, including room and board. Double that amount for a degree from a private school. Of course, when you finally finish your four years of school and minimum of three years of residency, even low-paid family practitioners usually get an annual starting salary of at least $143,000, while orthopedic surgeons start at almost three times that.
Click here to find out more!

But before you apply for any medical school funding, check the fine print. Many of the good deals have some heavy-duty strings attached. Military scholarships, for example, typically require students to put in two years of service for every year they received a scholarship.

Completely free ride—tuition and living expenses—with few strings attached:

The University of Central Florida is offering completely free rides to all 40 members of the class of 2013.

Fine print: Next year will be the medical school's first year in existence, so there might be some first-year jitters.

Vanderbilt: A few full-ride scholarships for top-notch students are detailed here.

Washington University: A few full-ride scholarships for top-notch students are detailed here.

Completely free ride, with notable strings:

Military—If you're officer material, the military will pay your tuition and living expenses through four years of medical school whether you're in the Army, Navy, or Air Force.

Fine Print: Doctors generally serve one year of active duty for every year of scholarship they receive, but they must serve a minimum of two years.

Work in the boonies—The National Health Service will pay tuition and living expenses for those training to become primary-care physicians.

Fine print: Recipients will be assigned to needy areas and must work at least one year for every year of a scholarship. They'll also need to be good and lucky: The NHS gets seven times more applications than it has scholarships.

Researchers—The National Institutes of Health will pay tuition and a living stipend for those interested in spending the eight years in school necessary to receive an M.D. and a research Ph.D. through programs like its Medical Scientist Training Program.

Fine print: These scholarships are designed to help those who want to become research scientists, not Beverly Hills plastic surgeons.

Free tuition—Some scholarships cover only tuition, leaving medical students to pay for their living expenses, which can easily run more than $2,000 a month.

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University will offer free tuition to all future medical students.

Fine print: The Cleveland Clinic focuses on training researchers and academics. You'll need to have good grades, scores, and luck. Last year, before the new scholarship program was announced, the Cleveland Clinic received 1,423 applications for its 32 slots. It'll probably be even more competitive this year.

Very low-cost tuition:

The Mayo Clinic promises every admitted medical student a scholarship of at least $25,000. That means students in the fall of 2008 will be charged no more than $4,200. And many will get other scholarships to cover that.

Loan repayment programs:

Serve in the backcountry—The National Health Service Corps will repay $50,000 in education debt for two years of service in needy areas. It will repay up to $35,000 for a third year.

Post-Residency Doctor Incomes in NY: 2007 Survey
While most income figures mentioned on this blog are often mid-career incomes, "exit surveys" from the outgoing batch of residents is a great way to gather information on the job market and starting salary offers for fresh-of-the-mill doctors. The University of Albany School of Public Health has been publishing workforce study reports for various occupations in the state of
New York since 1997. The 2007 report indicates a continued strong job market for physicians in US, with only 4% of the surveyed residents without jobs at the time of the survey.

Here are some of the median starting income offers ( pre-tax, base salaries + Bonuses)

Highest:

Orthopedics : $259,700
Radiology : $257,000)
Anesthesiology: $242,100
Cardiology $241,900

Lowest:

Primary Care Group (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics) : $142,000
Pediatrics: $110,000

More notable excerpts from the report:

"Generalists received approximately the same number of job offers as specialists"

"Among the specialty groups, the highest median starting incomes were facility based specialties (including anesthesiology, pathology, and radiology; $247,000) and surgical sub-specialties ($238,800). Surgery-general experienced the highest average annual increases in starting income from 2002 to 2007 (11%)."

"Individual specialties seeing the greatest average annual increase were dermatology, pulmonary disease, and pathology"

"Ophthalmology was the only specialty that did not experience an increase in median starting income between 2002 and 2007."

An indirect indicator of demand for a specialty could be the ability to find a job in a location of choice.

"The highest percentages of graduates having difficulty finding a satisfactory practice position were in physical medicine and rehabilitation (59%), geriatrics (56%), hematology/oncology (42%), and pediatric subspecialties (38%). Conversely, otolaryngology (0%), pulmonary disease (0%), gastroenterology (4%), and ophthalmology (11%) had the fewest respondents reporting difficulty"

Hmm...I thought there was a relatively good demand for geriatricians - or maybe that demand is to surge when the baby boomers start retiring, peaking in 2020-2030.

Number of Job Offers Received:

"The mean number of job offers received by graduates in 2007 was 3.64"
"Dermatology (6.53) + gastroenterology (5.60) graduates received the most job offers."
"Neurologists received fewer offers (2.00) than any other specialty."

Hmmm...receiving more than 2 job offers is strong enough a job market for me ;-)

Wednesday, March 5, 2008
So what's this radiology thing all about, anyway?
This'll be a non-running post. My friend just read this post and called me, asking "WTF? I thought this was a RUNNING blog?!" Ok, I'm definitely diverging a bit here, but I did get a bit tired of writing about "well, crashed again on my run" alternating with "hey - I'm back! Well, kind of." So I'll diverge a bit and expound a bit more on the other part of my life that has retaken the lead in priority after a few months in the back seat to the Houston marathon.

What the heck does a radiologist do, anyway? Our specialty is image analysis, with a smaller component of image-guided procedures. This means reading X-rays, ultrasounds, nuclear medicine scans, CT scans, and MRI scans, as well as a smattering of needle-based procedures mostly centered around getting pieces of tissue from inside the body without resorting to open surgery. On average, radiologists in practice work 50 hours per week, and generally have very high job satisfaction on informal job surveys, with relatively few physicians leaving the field compared to other specialties. Reimbursement ($$$) for radiologists has also been particularly good as of late, and despite the looming inevitable budget cuts that will knock back radiology salaries by a hefty percentage, most radiologists are quite comfortable financially, even with $200K of medical school loans to deal with after graduation.

I am actually a "radiology resident", or "radiologist in training." The road to becoming a radiologist is definitely the hardest part of getting into the specialty - it is a highly, highly desirable job post, with more interested and qualified applicants than spots available. Deciding to traverse the road of a MD to radiology involves going pre-med in college and graduating with distinction (no slacking), then gaining acceptance to a medical school, which will then occupy 4 more years of your life. The average debtload from medical school alone is $150-$200k, and rising rapidly. If you're lucky or stupid enough to do the MD/Phd track as I did (less than 5% of MDs in general opt for this route), and devoted 4 years of my life specifically to PhD research in the middle of my MD training, the tuition for medical school is waived - but you've just lost 4 more years of your prime adult years as well.

Even then, you're not even close to home free, though! For radiology, you pretty much have to graduate in the top 50%, if not top 25% of your medical school class to have a legitimate shot at gaining a spot. The general routine is applying to 20 to 40 radiology programs around the country during the 4th year of medical school, and then you're left literally to the mercy of a computer-guided matching program that finds the best match between your picks and the programs that interviewed you. As a result, geographical preference can be severely limited, even as a strong candidate. This "matching" stage really is a critical moment for many in the medical field, for if you go "unmatched", it means that you were not ranked highly enough by any of your selected programs and thus your future in your selected specialty is unlikely to happen. (You would have to spend at least another complete year bolstering your application with research, or giving up altogether and going for something less competitive.)

Perhaps one of the worst parts of this process, is that there's very flexibility. If you take a few months "off" for any reason, you have to justify it in writing at any stage of your applications and provide evidence that you were doing something "medically relevant." You can't just switch jobs and specialties as you would, say, in a financial sector job - you're really locked in from the get-go, and any deviations from the accepted training guidelines will be well documented as a PERMANENT black spot in your record. Yes, this mark will have to be re-documented over and over again for every year that you renew your medical license, for the rest of your life (or career.) I would LOVE to take a year off from training to say, run or travel, and do nothing medically related, but the amount of administrative BS I would have to wade through for the rest of my entire career is simply not worth it.

Before starting radiology residency, you are pretty much forced to do a general "internship." This is the year of suffering that everybody fears, for good reason. It's your first encounter with real patients and real problems, and as the low guy on the totem pole, all of the badness, from undesired shifts, to god-awful procedures and scutwork, get directed to you. Still, things are orders of magnitude better than 15-20 years ago, where this internship position really was no better than pure slavery, and where sexual harassment and constant humiliation really were the norm. Enough horror stories emerged over the last 2 decades such that the national medical association now takes any reports of abuse quite seriously, and limits work hours in-house to 80 hours. These guidelines really have improved our lives, and I am grateful for them, as well as the oversight to limit intern abuse. My internship was challenging, as expected, but fully worth the experience. Furthermore, I experienced zero humiliation or ridicule while on service, and was treated as a valuable contributor to the medical team. This is good for both doctors and patients.

Life as a radiology resident is challenging, but amongst the more benign of the various residencies out there. It's sad to say it, but a large reason for this is that radiologists are insulated from direct patient care. "Frontline" doctors, such as the ER physician, or the surgeon, deal primarily the patient, and then come to us in consultation. As most primary caregivers will tell you, this means that you are usually not only dealing with the medical problem at hand, but with the constellation of psychosocial problems that come with them, ranging from things as serious as insurance lapses during critical chemotherapy, to mundane but extraordinarily vexing things such as patients unable to leave your office because they can't afford a cab ride home. Radiologists thus get the luxury of time, a controllable work environment, and in particular, efficiency in work since we can sidestep most of the non-medical issues as consultants, and primarily deal with physicians. The worst part of our job as radiology residents is the after-hour responsibilities, not affectionately known as "being on call." Meaning that you can get called or paged by anybody who needs you. Again, the type of calls we get in radiology are generally much more manageable than some other frontline caretakers. Typical "calls" I would get as an ICU resident were urgent calls because "your patient is about to die unless you do something NOW!" whereas my calls now are more for more leisurely complex diagnoses.

As pleasant as looking as pictures and talking to smart people all day sounds, there is a fair amount of stress during work. I definitely underestimated the vast amount of knowledge required for radiological sciences. Since starting a little of a year and a half ago, I have read about 30 super-dense radiological textbooks cover-to-cover, half of them of which are over 400 pages in length, and am constantly battling memory loss. If you runners think Lore of Running was dense, you would literally cry if you saw what I have to wade through. Reading Lore of Running is like reading a glamour magazine in comparison to the force-feeding of knowledge that I have to undergo on a daily basis. I average anywhere from 1 to 4 hours per day in academic reading, and this is on top of whatever work responsibilities I have. As you can imagine, TV, social activities, and going out, have pretty much disappeared. Aside from running, and moments online which I can squeeze in at weird hours, it's a full day. To ensure that we residents stay "sharp", there are annual exams, and in particular, both oral and written board exams in your final years, to ensure that you've gotten your fair share of minutiae. These exams are difficult, and sufficiently esoteric that unless you are specifically studying for them, there is little chance of passing by relying on everday experience. Perhaps the main thing that gets me through this otherwise tortuous task is my self-knowledge that I am particular good at what I do, and am motivated to maximize my potential in this wonderful field. I chose radiology because it plays to my strongest features, which is my ability to assimilate and synthesize detailed information in vast quantities. I have finely honed my time-efficient study skills to a razor's edge over my entire life, and I do feel that my lifetime commitment to this task has given me a substantial edge in my field, which allows me to accomplish learning goals which are considered insurmountable by most residents. This is highly relevant for running and marathoning because it frees up time for other pursuits such as marathoning. There would be absolutely, positively NO marathoning if I were struggling to keep up with standards as a radiologist. It's a luxury item for me!

Here are some photos of me at work at perhaps the nicest of our workplaces at the county hospital. As you can see, it's a physically sedate job - I'm on that chair pretty much all day. Minimal walking, and definitely no lifting. I do get called to do needle-based procedures about once a day, but those are quite lightweight as well. The bulk of my activities constititute pulling up a variety of films from a list on the computer, assessing them, and then dictating my report onto the computer system. A few clinicians come down to ask specific questions and have findings pointed out, but for the most part, it can be a pretty solitary experience. At UCLA, we do have great staff who are dedicated to teaching, and we can count on an hour or more of each day dedicated to didactic sessions separate from the typical workload.

Doing my thing

We also get fancy computers to maximize our clinical viewing. The monitors we use are super-high resolution, and the combined cost for one of the workstations pictured below is $40,000. Ironically, we occasionally are called to evaluate images while on duty at home when we're on a type of call where after hours, we get to go home, and we're then interpreting these very same images on a run-of-the-mill personal PC and a regular internet connection. Having such fancy computers is also a mixed blessing - it allows us to more rapidly acquire and view images, but it has also dramatically increased the quantity of work that we are supposed to throughput. It is pretty common for us to not be able to keep up with the flood of images coming into our stack.

This is the only room with a window I've EVER worked with in radiology - the rest are pitch-black caves, and nowhere near this nice


Getting paid as a radiology resident is completely non-negotiable. There is a standard rate set by the national residency councils with small cost of living adjustments for region, and that's what you get per year. It works out to about $40,000 per year pre-tax, or $10 per hour post-tax given my best per-hour estimate including call shifts and excluding the significant number of hours I spend for work-related reading. This doesn't sound bad at all (hey - at least we're getting paid at all!), but consider that most of the on-call duties that we cover would ordinarily require a physician or high-level nurse practitioner who would charge at least $150 per hour, if not close to $300 per hour for the exact same services, and you can start to see the disparity. As mentioned before, we also get the joy of having to cover all of the undesirable shifts, which includes weekends, evenings, and all holidays, with no overtime or bonus pay. It really is all about very, very delayed gratification in terms of the financial situation here, to the point that I don't even think about it anymore. I can't even fantasize about what I'll do with that attending-physician salary, since it's been so long at this level that I can't even imagine getting compensated reasonably for what I do. My car is inherited from my mom from 1997, I live in a shared apartment, own virtually no clothing worth more than $40 per item outside of my Brooks running jacket and interview suit, and generally am known as a perennial cheapo on the Runners World forums for advocating Target C9 gear in favor of fancier stuff such as Under Armor or Patagonia. It's definitely NOT a glamorous life as a resident (unless you or your parents are independently wealthy!)

Overall though, I really feel that being in the field of radiology is a privilege and wonderful experience. The benefits far outweigh the drawbacks, and most senior radiologists continue to practice into their late, late years, which is a good sign that they are not suffering from premature burnout. Most radiologists I know are very happy people, with little to no regrets about being in their field of choice. The major caveat to all of this, is the long and arduous road getting there which I have outlined above. As much as I love my field, I would counsel my own future children to seriously reconsider the long commitment they would be required to undertake if they decide to go a similar route to radiology. I will be age 35 before getting my first "real job", and will have had a combined total of 13 years of postgraduate training (8 years MDPhD + 4 residency + 1 fellowship) with zero time off and very little financial compensation commensurate to my work hours and qualifications. It's great once you're there, but wow, getting there can be a real ****.

That's about it for my boring "real" life when I'm not fantasizing about running a 3:10 BQ marathon. I've got a lot of other hobbies and interests in my previous life that I may expound upon later (Boo-Boo runner has voted for one of the many stories about my highly stressful youth as a Juilliard violinist), but for now, I'm off to do my 11-mile run with 6 tempo on the track. Good luck to you all in your various life exploitations - I'm always amazed at what other marathoners do during their non-running lives!

Year 2007 Sign-on Bonus averages for US Physician Specialties
The 3rd Quarter results of the Physician Recruiting Standard Survey for 2007 released by the Delta Group - shows an increase in the dollar amounts offered as the sign-ons to lure physicians...or an increase in the size of those carrots..

Here are the averages for some specialties from the Report for the 3rd Quarter for the Year 2007:

1. Cardiology: $25,000/-
2. Family Medicine : $18,000/-
3. General Surgery: $25,000/-
4. Hospitalist: $15,500/-
5. Internal Medicine: $15,000/-
6. Neurology: $21,000
7. Neurosurgery: $60,000/-
8. Pediatrics: $15,000/-
9. Radiology: $27,000/-

As compared to last year, the bonuses went up for about 80% of the physician specialties

These bonuses are either paid as lump-sum cash or are the value of services offered, like a hotel stay prior to the physician purchasing his / her own house.

Download the free figures for rest of the specialties plus average income survey results by the Delta Group Here



RESIDENCY SALARIES in United States
Resident = Bottom of the doc food chain ? ;-)

"Residency" and "Fellowships" in the USA are both a type of "Graduate Medical Education" - while Medical school would be classified as Undergraduate.

The 2008 Mean Annual Pre-Tax stipends in United States for a MD Resident (also called house-staff) from any specialty were as follows:

* 1st Year (PGY1 / Intern ): $46,000

* 2nd Year (PGY2): $48,000

* 3rd Year (PGY3): $50,000

* 4th Year (PGY4): $52,000/-

* 5th Year (PGY5): $54,100/-

* 6th Year (PGY6): $56,500/-


Note: These are means based on a national survey by the AAMC - the actual figures can vary by $3,000 to $4000 on either side of the mean, an at times more.

(Residencies like Internal medicine and Family Practice have a duration of three years, Neurology & Pathology is four years while General Surgery is usually 5 years, Neurosurgery 6 years.)


Chief Residents may or may not receive an additional stipend of $2000/- to $3500/- a year (not a rule), and sometimes may include a promise of getting into their fellowship programs


Note: Some places may even offer more depending on the cost of living - such as New York. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center is known to offer the highest residency salaries and here's the latest figures on the website:

PGY1 = $51,514.00
PGY2 = $56,137.00
PGY3 = $61,597.00
PGY4 = $63,209.00
PGY5 = $65,234.00


But then again, a Resident has some good perks & benefits - like most programs provide free food to residents while on duty, free laundry for their coats and free parking spaces...besides health insurance. As a sample, have a look at the Internal Medicine residency compensation and benefits at the Mayo Clinical college of Medicine, Arizona. Here's another example - Pathology residency and Fellowship Salaries at Baystate - Tufts Pathology Residency Program.Here's another sample look at salaries and benefits at Carle Foundation family Practice Residency


Lot of banks too open up to residents, providing zero-down payment loans for buying houses !



Q. Do Residency Salary Levels depend on the Specialty ?

No - Usually Residents of all specialties at a given institution receive the same salary levels, which rather depend on the year (i.e. PY1, 2, 3 or 4) . Salary levels may vary from one institution to another and often vary from state to state, as per living costs.

Q. Is there a difference in residency salaries of MD and DO (Doctor of Osteopathy) candidates ?

A. No, all are paid the same - MD (Americans and IMGs) and DO candidates

It is good to know that Residency Salaries and in fact for all Graduate Medical Education (GME) in the USA is paid for by mainly by Medicare and partly through state-level Medicaid funds, both of which are derived from tax-payers money in the US


Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have proposed a new payment structure for Residency pays to Hospitals hosting Residency Programs, Click Here to Read.


Residency Work Hours & Lifestyle - Most of the specialties are Hectic ! the most rigorous years of a physicians life - the 80-hour per week work limits now imposed on a resident have bought some sanity, but that limit is often transcended under the demands of patient care. Generally speaking, University Programs and University-Affiliated residency programs are more saner to work in as compared to the more busy community programs.

Related Reads about Residency Lifestyles:

A Day in the Life of an R1
7–8 a.m. — R1 pre-rounding

Each day, R1s will follow an average of five to eight patients. They use pre-rounding time to get sign-out from the R1 on-call the night before, discuss events with the nurses, review flow sheets, examine their patients and talk to families.
8–8:30 a.m. — Work rounds

The entire team meets in the team room to organize their work and patient care for the morning. The team consists of medical students, sub-interns, interns, senior residents, an attending, a care coordinator and team coordinator. This is also an opportunity for brief teaching sessions.
8:30–9 a.m. — Morning report

Residents and attendings from all disciplines attend morning report to review and discuss an interesting case. Morning report is run by the chief residents.
9–11:30 a.m. — Rounds

Ward teams meet and round after morning report. Teams “walk round” to each patient’s room. As a part of “family-centered rounds,” patients and their families, nurses and social workers join the medical team to plan care for the patient. The team coordinator facilitates rounds and performs administrative duties for the team throughout the morning. Bedside teaching by general medicine and subspecialty attendings occurs daily during this time.
11:30 a.m.–12 p.m. — Work rounds

The focus of this time is to help the post-call intern complete work, including sign-out, in preparation for getting everyone on the team to noon conference. This is also protected time to talk with consultants, touch base with primary care providers or perform other patient care prior to noon conference.
12:15–1 p.m. — Noon conference (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday)

Faculty members from various disciplines present topics in a variety of formats. Lunch is provided. Evaluations are collected in order to improve the following year’s curriculum.
12:15–1 p.m. — Intern support group (Thursday)

Once weekly, senior residents take their interns’ pagers so that the R1s can participate in this session. The group is facilitated by a social worker, and the time is an opportunity for interns to confidentially share their experiences and partake in delicious snacks!
1–5 p.m. — General patient care

R1s follow up on issues or tests ordered on their patients. If on-call, they meet and admit new patients while being supervised by their senior resident. This is also a time when general medicine or subspecialty attendings teach on topics relevant to the team’s current patients. In addition to reviewing radiology images on our PACS system, residents also have the opportunity to review these films with a pediatric radiologist.
1–5 p.m. — Continuity clinic

Throughout the three years of training, residents follow a panel of patients at one of several community clinic sites. Continuity clinic is scheduled for one half day every week.
5 p.m.–7 a.m. — On-call

While on the wards, R1s are paired with a senior resident and take call every fourth night. On call, R1s will admit and work up new patients while also providing care to the remaining patients on their team until the following morning.

A night float system is in place to provide relief for admitting teams so that interns are protected from most new admissions after 11 p.m., allowing them to finish their work and usually get some sleep

A Day in the Life of a UT Southwestern Neurology Resident
As a PGY-2 Junior Resident on the General Ward Service …

7:00 AM
A new day - I start at morning resident rounds. During this session, the general neurology and stroke senior residents meet with the residents that were on call to hear about new admissions, consults and other active issues. Cases are distributed to the appropriate residents. Depending on the call rotation, I may receive new patients.

7:15 – 9:00 AM
Work rounds - I round on my patients to see how they are doing and review new lab or imaging results. I also familiarize myself with any new patients and prepare the history and exam presentation. I discuss any questions with the senior resident (the “ward boss”) on my service. On the general neurology service, I am likely to have a wide variety of cases. I may be caring for someone with an acute myasthenia gravis exacerbation, progressive MS receiving chemotherapy, Guillan-Barre syndrome, brain tumor, chronic meningitis or neurosarcoidosis – just to list a few… I’m also likely to see patients that have strange, undiagnosed neurological disorders. Most of my patients are on the 8th floor at Parkland hospital where the nurses and staff are all experienced in taking care of neurology patients. A few of my patients are located at Zale-Lipshy University hospital (which is connected to Parkland through a corridor).

9:00 – 12:00
Attending rounds - Our team is comprised of two to three junior residents and one senior resident. There are also usually one or two psychiatry or neurosurgery interns rotating with the ward service. We also have 3 to 4 medical students doing their neurology clerkship. Some of the medical students are assigned to help me with my patients. Teaching and supervising the students helps me to hone my neurology skills. During attending rounds, we review the diagnosis and treatment plans for our patients and learn under the direction of our attending faculty.

12:10 – 1:00
Noon conference. The core lecture series (on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday) is a 18-month course curriculum designed to cover all of the main areas in neurology, including neurological emergencies, neuromuscular, stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, pediatric neurology, evidence based medicine, medical ethics, business and career planning, etc… On Wednesdays, we have grand rounds with the whole department. This is a time to hear a visiting professor or one of our own faculty. On Friday, noon conference is focused on neuroanatomy and board review. During these sessions, we review a weekly reading assignment. This is a great opportunity to unwind and chat with my classmates at the end of the week.

1:00 PM
Back to the hospital to finish any remaining business. This might be some additional rounds with the attending or following up the necessary work-up and paper work on my patients. I may also evaluate new consultations that may have been requested throughout the day.
One afternoon each week, I have my Parkland Continuity Clinic. Continuity clinic is an opportunity for me to serve as the primary neurologist for the evaluation and management of my patients throughout all three years of residency. The clinic patient population is diverse and includes patients with migraine, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, myasthenia gravis, movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and dystonias (including an opportunity to learn how to administer botox injections).

4:00 PM
The day is nearly done. The residents meet together to give the on-call resident a check-out of the current patients. If I am on call (every fifth night), I take the call pager from the emergency room resident and begin to receive calls. I am now ready to see new patients and handle any urgent consults. My senior resident is always available by pager to help me with any questions or other issues that I may have. Plus, my attending (as well as neurosurgeons, neurointerventional radiologists and other specialists) is ready to help with critical patients.

8:00 PM
A senior resident, assigned to the night float rotation, joins me for overnight call. As a two resident team, we take care of emergency neurology consultations, admissions and our neurology inpatients.
...........................................................................................................
US medical school fees are so high that...
....so high that the American Association of Medical Colleges (www.aamc.org) called on all American medical schools to mandate disability insurance coverage for all medical students.

Now, this is not a new fact - the call for the mandate was made way back in 2005 - but does highlight that these high medical school debts are tolerated only because the profession of medicine is highly paid. So, if this promise of a high income is suddenly lost due to a disability, the student lands in a hot boiling soup of soaring debts with unsure income.

How high are the fees ? Average medical student debt in America at the end of medical school is said to hover around $120,000 to $150,000

These high debts play a big role in explaining why American medical students are more prone to go for the higher paying fields like Radiology, Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine - while leaving a void in the lower paying ones like Pediatrics, Family Medicine, Psychiatry, etc. ..which in turn makes these later fields easy to get in for the International Medical Graduate community.


Nurses Who Earn Like Physicians Almost
I started out in the Medical field as a nurse aid working under nurses in assisted living homes as means to finance my college education. Soon after I graduated with my B.S. in Biology I applied to PA school and got in. I since have graduated from the program and I am now getting ready to attend Medical School. When I was applying to PA school, at that time, I felt uncertain about my future. I knew I wanted to have a role in medicine, but I wasn’t sure where. I considered RN, but being a CNA for 4 years I learned their limitations. I wanted more responsibility. At the same time I didn’t want to spend all those years in school when I wasn’t 100% sure I wanted to retire in Medicine. So the best thing at the time was PA. I was attracted to the flexibility of the profession. If I didn’t like the job or I just got bored with the specialty I can change. That’s the way I felt at the time I was applying to PA school. As a PA student I was exposed to various aspects of medicine I didn’t know existed. I became good and excelled at what I did and I enjoyed it and now I have a passion for it. I want to reach the peak of my profession. I have PA friends who make $200,000 or more asking me what’s the point of going to Medical school when you can make as much as an MD with the education you have now. My answer is the Education. I want to excel in my profession. I want to be able to provide the pts I treat with the best medicine I can provide them with. As a PA student, we were trained along side with the Medical students. We took many of the same courses as well as the same exams. We were actually held to higher standards then the Medical students were. For example, on exams they were graded on a curve while we were not. But what I did notice is the level of education. The medical students go deeper, spend more time on subjects, and receive a richer education then we do. It was obvious when I went on my medical rotations. The PA student knew more about DX and treatment then the medical student, but the medical student knew more about the physiology and biology then we did. We received basic courses in those subjects, but not as in-depth. Having 20 years of experience working as a PA still does not equal the education that the doctors receive through medical school, residency, fellowship, and internship training. For the nurse who made a comment about working as an ER nurse for 20 yrs doesn’t mean you know as much as a doctor, PA, or NP who has only worked for 3 yrs. Their level of education far exceeds your experience. Is it feasible to say that a CNA working as a CNA for 20 years knows more then an RN with no experience? Hell no. I was a CNA, I know what they know and they know nothing. In the ER, you only see the clinical picture, but you don’t understand the biology, pathology, or physiology of what that pt is experiencing. Nor do you understand what the provider is ruling in / out when he is performing a physical exam. You don’t understand because you haven’t been trained in it. Having prior experience in any field is always good, but when you start NP school or Medical school, regardless of how many years of experience you have at your previous job, you will learn quick on how much you don’t know. And if you go into any new program thinking you know everything and not accepting the fact that you don’t know much, you will fail as a student and/or as a provider.

Texas PA-C

Physician Specialty Demand and Salary Trends for 2007
The Delta Companies offer staffing solutions for Physicians all over the USA and release yearly data on what physician specialties are hot and what the earning trends are. Here's a list of the physician specialties showing a trend for highest demand for the year 2007.

1. Internal Medicine
2. Orthopedics
3. Family Medicine
4. Cardiology
5. General Surgery
6. Hospitalist
7. Urology
8. Pulmonary Critical Care
9. Gastroenterology
10. Neurology
11. Ob-Gynecology
12. Radiology
13. Hematology / Oncology
14. Psychiatry
15. E.N.T.

How did these folks generate that list ? From the physician search requests they get from their tons of clients.

I am surprised that Pediatrics does not make it in these top-15 spots - either there are too many pediatricians around or the kids are getting better in health - or yeah - the family docs are looking after them ;-)

Download the Reports Here.


The First Quarter 2007 Reports also includes data on Starting Salary offers for various specialties. The figures that stood out were:

- Neurosurgery = $708,396 per Year
- Radiology = $608,684 per Year
- Orthopedics = $566,280 per Year

Hmmm...and according to this news report, the following specialties saw a rise in 2007 Starting salaries :

- E.N.T
- Pulmonary Critical care
- Psychiatry
- Orthopedic Surgery

The Following Specialties saw a decrease in average starting salaries:

- Oncology
- Anesthesiology

PhysicianDepot Survey: Physicians Paid Highest in Southern USA
PhysicianDepot announced the results of its nation-wide physicians survey and here are the features and observations that screamed for my attention :

1. Generally speaking the physicians in Southern US States are paid more, next in line are the mid-west doctors, and the states paying the physicians the least (as far as averages go) come out be the western states.

2. The highest Paid Specialties, often hovering above the $400,000 a year range, were the surgical ones - notably Neurosurgery, Cardiovascular Surgery, Interventional Cardiology and
Orthopedics

3. Primary Care stuck with the lowest doctor salaries as usual (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics.etc)

4. Even Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation fared better than the primary care specialties

5. I now know that Radiation Oncology can pay above $250,000 a year ! Yeah - I can see a halo behind my mirror reflection ;-)

To see the salary Survey figures for yourself - Click here


The 20 top-paying jobs:

1. Chief executive officer: $1.18 Million
2. Chief operating officer: $690,219
3. Top-subsidiary executive: $624,831
4. Top-sector executive: $525,657
5. Top-division executive: $510,292
6. Intermediate corporate financial associate: $459,784
7. Heart transplant surgeon: $446,666
8. Cardiothoracic surgeon: $446,255
9. Top international executive: $425,839
10. Chief financial officer: $418,772
11. Top administrative executive: $410,335
12. Top legal executive: $404,235
13. Top mergers and acquisitions executive: $399,581
14. Top mortgage executive: $399,485
15. Top power trading executive: $391,911
16. Neurosurgeon: $386,906
17. Top investment executive: $386,148
18. Chief of surgery: $380,756
19. Senior corporate financial associate: $376,761
20. Top retail banking executive: $373,383

Will Radiologists Steal from the Gastroenterologist's Salary ?
Today, as in 2007, Gastroenterologists earn big dollars- thanks to the heavy volume of colonoscopies they perform for routine cancer screening, biopsies, followups and excisions. It is a "cash-cow" for them as we discussed on this blog earlier in the post on low Geriatrician incomes, since Medicare approved paying for all these screening colonoscopies since 2001.

However, a recent development threatens the source of these big bucks for Gastroenterologists - A study which showed that the non-invasive Virtual Colonoscopies that a Radiologist can perform are as effective as traditional invasive colonoscopies ! Read about that news Here and Here.

What do you think patients or even you and me are gonna prefer ? A tube up their hinds or a simple half-minute X-ray procedure ? And if Medicare decided that it would stop payment for the traditional optic colonoscopy and pay for the less dangerous, faster and possibly cheaper Virtual colonoscopy - Gastroenterologists lose ...a bit at least, since even if a polyp was virtually detected, a gastro doc would need to do a colonoscopy to get the sucker out.

Of course, I am talking extremes here - there will always be something else the Gastro MD will do - or maybe even take control of the Virtual Colonoscopy themselves ...just like the Cardiologsits invented "Interventional Radiology" to protect themselves from losing business to the Radiologists :-)


A great analysis appeared on the New York Times - Read that here.

It is interesting how it throws light on the constant political wars that go on between various medical specialties, at least in the US - Family Practitioners are 'at war' with the Internists, Interventional cardiologists with the Radiologists, Gynecologists with the Radiologists (Sonography issues) .etc.etc. ..in short, whenever areas of expertise overlap.

But even Radiologists had their way with this one - as Dr. Rex says on an NYtimes article:

"We have a lot of organs - the esophagus, the stomach, the small bowel, the liver, the pancreas. I think we’ve got a lot to do. Gastroenterologists will still be able to make a comfortable living"


America is an ageing population - "Baby Boomers" (Those born between 1946 to 1964), who represent the largest population group is fast approaching retirement age, and will start needed lotsa health care for chornic disease conditions like arthropathies, Ischemic Heart disease, Renal conditions, etc. Hence, naturally, Geriatrics - the medical specialty dealing with diseases of the aged, was supposed to be the next big thing in the US - well that was what was believed 2-3 years ago. But instead, geriatrics salaries have been found to be dismally low hovering near 160,000$ -170,000$ a year.

Geriatrics can be done as a Fellowship following either Family Practice or Internal Medicine. Following seem to be some of the reasons why pays have not seen increases:

- Family practioners and Internists already deal with a lot of Old patient diseases
- There are no specialized procedures that only Geriatricians are licensed to perform - I mean even Family practitioners do Colonoscopies, which pay !
- Medical students don't really have any special "Geriatric rotations"

One of the keys for docs in US to make more money is to do a lot of procedures, coz insurance companies pay well for those..as against consulting, examining and prescribing medicine. Every specialty will have some "cash cow" procedures to mint money from - like CABG for Cardiologists, Dialysis for Nephrologists, Colonoscopies for Family practitioners..and of course surgical branches like Orthopedics are full of procedures. As this 4th year medical student puts it, sticking a camera down someone's throat brings in more cash than spending an hour counseling and addressing the fears of a diabetic patient.


Read more about this on New York Times article: "Geriatrics Lags in the Age of High-Tech Medicine"

GERIATRICS AIN'T PAYING TOO MUCH
So how does the problem look in the Geriatric US ?

As per data from the American Geriatrics society, by 2030, the U.S. population age 65 and up will exceed 70 million, about double the number in 2000 - BUT - the number of geriatricians has decreased from 9,256 in 1998 to fewer than 7,000 in 2006. Current estimated need is about 14,000 geriatricians. By 2030, an estimated 36,000 will be needed.

I am guessing the US needs a better economic model for paying out physicians based on how much economic and health benefit they give the country rather than purely on the basis of how 'specialized' they are. Canada and UK are probably doing a better job, paying out the General and Family practitioners much more with new reforms in recognition of the great 'pyloric' or gate-keeping work the do for the health system. US needs to wake up to this.


TOP FIVE EARNING PHYSICIAN SPECIALTIES in USA (2006)
According to a recent survey conducted by the famous Modern Healthcare :

Orthopedic Surgeons stood at the top of the income ladder averaging a total cash earnings of around $403,000 in 2006. Incidentally, an Orthopedic specialist also registered the single-highest salary on the survery : about $489,000 !

Radiologists ranked second, with average pay of $394,000/-

Third came noninvasive cardiologists, at $370,000/-

Urologists held up the fourth spot averaging around $340,000/-

And the Anesthesiologists came up 5th with average salaries touching $333,000/-

Family practitioners continue to be at the bottom of the salary ladder averaging $165,000
Pediatricians were only about $100 higher than family practitioners, while Internists averaged about $177,000 in 2006 . However, Family Practitioner and Internists supposedly have seen the highest increase in salaries since the recent year, indicating a increase in demand in primary care and generalists !
Hmmmm....I wonder why cardiothoracic and Neurosurgeon Salaries do not feature in the top 5 ...

Yet, those were averages on top. They can get much higher as docs become senior within their organization or if they practice in a place of high demand and extremely low specialist supply - Check out this news article which speaks of $700,000/- salary for a cancer specialist in Montana and More than $200,000/- for a Nursing Director !

WHICH SPECIALTIES GET SUED THE MOST IN USA ?
"Being sued" in medical practice implies facing Malpractice litigation claims by patients seeking compensation from doctors for damages caused by either omission of good care or commission of bad care or both. The risk is very real for doctors in the US and many a times courts have awarded millions of dollars to the patients. Recently, this has been a cause of great concern to the country, since eventually, it increases the cost of healthcare in the US and people's taxes and health insurance premiums go up !

Being sued to the tune of gigantic dollars threatens to put a physician out of practice - this is why almost physicians in USA get themselves 'covered' by purchasing malpractice insurance.

Premiums i.e. the amount physicians have to pay each year to the protecting company, depend on the 'risk' of the specialty that the physician practices in. Here are the top specialties where doctor's get sued most often!


* Obstetrics - Gynecology
* Neurosurgery
* General Surgery
* Emergency medicine
* Orthopedic surgery
* Radiology
* Family Practice



Obstetrics-Gynecology presents with the highest risk of being sued by patients for malpractice and premiums that physicians must pay out of their own pockets can average $35,000 a year and sometimes much more in group / private practice ! According to Dr.Ronald Uva, chair of district II of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, liability premiums that ob-gyn docs must pay each year to cover themselves from losing their roofs in event of being sued, range from 40,000$ in upstate NY and a whopping $120,000/- in downstate ! Read more about it here.

Read this interesting article that says 76% Obstetricians get sued atleast once in the USA

State Variations in Premium rates are vast, often forcing doctors to pack bags and start up another practice in another state. For example I read about how Dr. Zimet left his orthopedic surgery practice in Pennsylvania after his yearly malpractice premiums hit $105,000/- and shifted to Virginia where the rates were $33,000 a year. Read the story Here.

The Golden Days are over...
but the silver is not too bad :-) Gone are the days when Physicians in the US could easily rake in more than a million dollars a year - thanks to the "Fee for Service" payment system that existed more than a decade ago. Under that system, the Insurance firms literally paid doctors for all that they billed their patients for. Then, you guessed right , the doctors overdid it - used up too many unnecessary services, kept patients for too long in the hospitals and earned their millions - while patient care quality suffered.

As insurance companies began to lose too much money and patients demanded better control on physician's quality of care - came the "Capitated payment systems" - the one that we are currently operating under. In this system, physicians /hospitals/ HMOs get a fixed total fee payment per diagnosis - a better term for which (you should know, since you will be working in the American Health System) is 'DRG' , or a Diagnosis Related Group. And, it is upto the physicians to keep their share from the total of what they get, after money has been spent on tests and Rx for the patient. So how do doctors make money and get competetive in such a scenario with tables turned ? Logical - they now do the opposite !! They try to reduce patients hospital stay (measured as Average Length of Stay - ALOS) , reduce unnecessary medical tests and save from patient care costs - so that they can get to keep a larger cut from the insurance payment. But at the same time, they cannot compromise on patient quality - thanks to the various accredidation programs and the newly launched public website that ranks patient care in hospitals.

This is why many physicians, who were used to the golden days, are grumpy about the new system that pays much less. However, the salaries are still not bad, when compared to those of the non-physician population. A good result of this need for quality improvement + Cost cutting has been a recent surge in the adoption of hospital information systems and technology like e-Prescription, Electronic Medical Records, Computerized Physician Order Entry Sytems, etc. to eliminate avoidable errors like misinterpreted medications, lost radiographs etc. and cut costs by eliminating paper, staff and automating many functions :-)

WHAT IS 'MOONLIGHTING'
For a Doc, it is never too dark to earn ...

The term refers to a physician slogging in the evenings [in the moonlight ;-)] for some extra $$ as a replacement for another physician. Do not confuse this with overtime - in moonlighting, physician A allows physician B to work his hours and gives physician B a 'cut' or a pre-agreed percentage of his pay. Whereas in overtime, physician A slogs extra hours as his own job !

This is typically done by junior physicians early in the game.

And just how much can a physician earn by moonlighting ? - A Cool additional 1000$-4000$ per week !

Having said that, it is usually easier for residents in primary care specialties (Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Ob-Gyn) to find Moonlighting Opportunities than the specialists. Some residents and Fellows have been known to make as much as 30,000$ to 40,000$ a year more through Moonlighting - all depends on how much you wanna slog it out...

It was interesting to read that in Japan, moonlighting is banned for trainee doctors - Read here about how some trainee docs were found moonlighting and earning upto 30,000 to 80,000 yen a Month working part-time.


Read more about Moonlighting Rules (and for IMGs) Here.

DO PHYSICIANS / DOCTORS EARN TOO MUCH ?
This debate caught steam ever since people first felt the pinch of expensive health-care. There are many aspects that one may argue over.


1. Physicians do spend a LOT of time of their lives (12 - 18 years) through break-neck studies of pre-med, medical school, residencies and fellowships, competition and terrible expenses to be reach where they are. Arrite, agreed that this alone should not be a excuse for earning a lot.

2. But physicians are also an investment that society makes to heal itself , maintain productivity and stay healthy (I agree preventive care has not got adequate attention it deserves)

3. Physician salaries that are reported are never calibrated to 40-hour weeks - they mostly represent salaries for 60-hour weeks on an average, while salaries in other fields mostly are 40 - 45 hour weeks. So when salaries are compared, the hourly rates should be rather compared - thus a $150,000 per annum salary for 60-hour week family medicine would mean $100,000 per annum if the same physician worked 40-hours a week instead.

4. Physician Salaries are NOT the biggest factors for costly healthcare, in fact they have been dropping steadily ever since Managed Care came to the scene - the big drivers for Medical costs in USA are : a. Ever-improving Medical Technology and Research b. Expensive and New Drugs c. Bad health choices that people make (Smoking, Obesity, etc. and consequent Cancers, Heart Diseases) and d. Uninsured People [44 Million in US] ALL of which contribute to increasing Insurance Premiums and Out-of-pocket payments and if you will e. The million dollars salaries and profits that health insurance companies channelize the health care dollars into.

5. What physicians do also drives a huge portion of the economy and create jobs for a lot of people in the health care arena - Nurses, Health care managers, Physician Assistants, Hospital Clerks, etc.

True that they earn good and high, but their salaries pale in comparison the richest lawyers, sports people, Entertainers and CEOs who count their salaries and bonuses in Millions of Dollars.
According to this news article, "In 1978 the average corporate CEO earned 35 times more than the average worker; today (2007) he (and yes, occasionally she) earns 262 times as much"
Now that's serious opportunities lost with all that money going into a single pocket, instead if corporations were refrained from paying out such enormous salaries, they would mostly use that cash to expand operations, creating more jobs...well, just my two dollars [the world of 2 cents is gone..;-)]

And plus we have kids less than 20 years old making more than 2 Million Dollars a year! I seriously doubt if any of the 946 Billionaires in the world (as of 2006) are practicing physicians ;-)

But then - yeah ! The Jan 2007 McKinsey Report did find that Physicians in USA were paid way to high as compared to other industrialized nations - to be specific, the report said US doctors were paid 56 Billion Dollars in Excess income - Read more here.


Click Here to see the results of the Poll I ran on this blog about whether US doctors are overpaid